Date: 01/31/02 12:36:14 PM

Name: 天峰

Email:

Subject: Re: Re: ぱ畃弘琌跑籔ぃ跑参砰

IP Address: 61.133.143.109







zara:
你好,一个月前我就在人文网页上看到你的问题,多次想回答你的问题都没有机会。
请谅。我上人文网站有点困难,我的英文水平不好,希望没有理解错你的意思。下面是回答。
现代科学在神经系统与精神现象之间关系上的认识有许多,比如人脑有着感觉区域,运动区域等等。但我所证明精神既是物质,不完全是由现代科学在神经系统与精神现象之间关系上的认识得出。证明这一点不能由归纳法得到,对于无限的精神内容与物质现象之间关系是不可能由归纳法得出的,这与形式逻辑上证明天下乌鸦一般黑是一个道理,只能由反证精神不可能不是物质来得出这一结论。
我不知你是否同意精神是可以运动变化的存在,如果你相信这一点,那么就要回答一个问题,精神与物质发生联系的原因是什么?一个可以和其它物质相互作用的精神存在必然具有力、空间、运动等等物质属性,那么除了认为精神既是物质以外还有别的可能吗?
如果你不同意我所认为的精神具有运动的属性,那么希望你能看看我的新的一篇文章,其中有一些我对于物质的论述,但我不知98期《人文》杂志是否会刊载,如没有我则会寄给你。大多数人对精神认识不清是因为对物质的认识上混乱的原故。
致 礼!
       天峰
fengyu@peoplemail.com.cn
                  2002-01-31
              

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Replying to:

Some questions about your article:
(1) Quote from your article: "借琌跑籔ぃ跑参砰弘妓琌跑籔ぃ跑参砰借Α璶琌и福竒跑て籔弘ず甧跑てΤ帝荡癸璓┦硂翴穨眔瞷厩靡碞琌弧弘籔借ㄤ跑てΑ琌砰┮и粄弘籔借福竒ㄤぃ跑琌砰弘琂琌借"
Question: Can you give some of the "scientific evidence" you mentioned that supports your view that the change in matter (neurological) is absolutely equivalent to change in mind?
(2) It seems to me that you are trying to draw the equivalency between "spirit" and "matter" based on one property - it can be static as well as dynamic. I wonder if this one property is the only property of "spirit" and the only property of "matter". If it is not the only one, you need to list out others to show their equivalence. My argument here is: how can we draw the equivalence without knowing all the properties of "spirit" and "matter"?